Typically a “Medical Record Review” is more legally focused whereas a “Second Opinion” is more patient care-focused.
Medical Record Review:
Many patients have concerns over treatment received but may have challenges receiving answers from medical providers. Patients may suspect negligence, omissions, or errors in their care but not have the training to identify these issues. A knowledgeable third party can provide an unbiased audit of an opinion on the data. It does not provide speculative or accusatory opinions about the general quality of medical care received or what the healthcare provider “did wrong.” Opinions formed during a medical record review are strictly based on whether all reasonable steps were followed. A detailed report of the findings may be generated for educational purposes.
Second Opinion:
A second opinion is typically sought by patients to confirm a diagnosis or treatment plan, or to explore alternative options for their healthcare. A second opinion involves a thorough review of the patient’s medical condition, previous treatments, and potential next steps in management without a legal framework. The goal is to provide guidance or recommendations for patient care by helping the patient make informed decisions about their health.
